Krokodil

Photo of Jake Himelfarb and Aaron Lawrence engaged
in the creative process, courtesy of Krokodil

Though the rock scene is more splintered than ever, and it seems too often that metal is simply co-opted for trendy aesthetics, there are still some whose idea of a good time is that sweet heavy metal goodness. Krokodil—named after the flesh-eating drug—offers hard death metal with a cozy old school feel, and a contagious onstage sense of fun sets them apart from other local metalheads.

Singer-guitarist Jake Himelfarb particularly has a penchant for giving the audience something to remember: from mooning the crowd on multiple occasions, to alleging to an audience that he self-bleached his rectum in the parking lot prior to the show, to licking and munching on a bloody tampon that threw itself onstage at one show at the Cobalt Café. 

“His antics bring life to our death-ridden sound,” says drummer Devlin Baldwin.

Says Lumberjack of Vengeance for the Fallen, "Krokodil is one of the few bands to gross me out. Two huge horns up for that accomplishment alone! Black metal mixed with shock value mixed with a total disregard for personal health... it doesn't get any more metal than that."

"I must say that Krokodil jams out some real quality death metal," says longtime Krokodil concert-goer and fan, Sarah Schönberger. "Their stage performance is also extremely entertaining, and something is always bound to go down, especially with such a stupid-ass fan base."

The band draws from a variety of musical influences, including black metal, death metal, old school heaviness, old jazz and some other genres. While their music writing process initiates as fairly independent, the band collaborates more closely as songs develop.

“We’re all pretty musical people and the fact we’ve all got input into our songs is a really big part of how our songs come out,” says bassist Aaron Lawrence. “I draw different things from different bassists… everyone brings something different to the table and I try to learn from all of it.” Says Baldwin of music in general, he loves "literally everything about it and what comes with it. It is what gets me out of bed in the morning and what carries me to bed at night. Being able to create my own music has only brought me to love it more."

“It's really satisfying to see the songs you spent hours making and even more rehearsing come to life onstage, and then to see people's reactions to that creation that I worked so hard on making,” says Himelfarb. “It makes every little frustration in being in a band, writing music and playing guitar worth it.” 

Adds Lawrence, “I love playing live, especially when everything’s tight and everyone’s firing on all cylinders. It’s always fun being able to act like an idiot in front of people for a half hour. But what really makes gigs fun is when the crowd has fun. That’s a weird sort of energy that connects the whole room and aside from just loving to play music in general, that connection is what makes the shows so special.”

“We get up there and do our best to play our songs well and whatever happens, happens,” says Baldwin. “Being up there with two of the funniest dudes I know is super fun. Jake brings the autism while Aaron and I hit it heavy with our rhythmic sexiness. If, by the end of our set, I see people with smiles on their faces, I know we've done our job.”

Krokodil is playing the Cobalt Café this Saturday night, March 29^th at 8:00.

Photo courtesy of Krokodil

Laverne Cox is the activist we need

I recently saw an ad promoting Chelsea Clinton’s speaking gig for the Human Rights Campaign’s inaugural address, and immediately Googled her to see what connection she has to the LGBT community. She has none. She is a straight, white, cisgendered, privileged daughter of notorious politicians. She does not represent our community, and the concept of her speaking for us is insulting.

Of course, the Human Rights Campaign is pretty much a sellout; they promote sanitized advocacy for the most privileged members of the LGBT community. Just one example of this: at a 2013 rally for marriage equality in front of the White House, the HRC asked people not to wave trans flags because they don’t consider marriage equality a trans issue.

Not only is marriage equality very much a trans issue, that action alone showed their true colors of excluding trans* people from their “community.”

The Human Rights Campaign truly extends very little effort in even making it look like they care about trans people and queers of color; to tie back to what made me write this article, this is reflected in who they choose to be the face of their campaign. Straight white cis people like Chelsea Clinton, easy-to-deal-with and already famous gays or lesbians… please, yall. Please.

The activist that, in my opinion, could best benefit and reflect the LGBT community, is Laverne Cox. As a black trans woman, she could provide representation to a huge part of the LGBT community that so often gets thrown under the bus. Additionally, she doesn’t waste time and seems almost effortlessly articulate—for real, check out the Katie Couric interview.

She was completely right in redirecting the focus away from transition to the extreme adversity and violence that trans people face so often—“The preoccupation with transition and with surgery objectifies trans people. And then we don’t get to really deal with the real lived experiences. The reality of trans peoples’ lives is that so often we are targets of violence. We experience discrimination disproportionately to the rest of the community… if we focus on transition, we don’t actually get to talk about those things.”

HELL YEAH. We don’t have any time to waste, and she knows it.

To summarize, I’m a massive fangirl for Laverne. The rest of the community should be too. As for the Human Rights Campaign—rename yourself. You’re a single-issue group advocating for a specific group, not the LGBT community.

Articles with supporting evidence:

http://www.policymic.com/articles/31563/human-rights-campaign-fails-to-advocate-for-minorities

http://themoonbat.com/2013/04/02/the-problem-with-the-hrc-logo-on-your-profile/

http://www.sanfranciscosentinel.com/?p=7291

Ladies, speak up- society's distortion of "nice"

We teach girls shame: Close your legs; cover yourself. We make them feel as though by being born female, they’re already guilty of something. As so, girls grow up to be women who cannot say they have desire. They grow up to be women who have to silence themselves. They grow up to be women who cannot say what they truly think….And they grow up to be women who have turned pretense into an art form. – Chimamanda Adichie

It feels like almost every move I make, there’s someone telling me I’m being too aggressive, too weird, crazy, asking for trouble, that I need to tone it down. Which is funny, because every time I’ve done something to be called “aggressive,” “weird” or “crazy,” it’s literally just been me being myself and thinking I deserve respect for being a person. All of my female friends who are similarly independent have dealt with similar adversity for similar reasons. And I don’t want to cause “trouble”—I just want to be understood and respected. But things aren’t that simple.

The truth is, most people do not want or like independent women. The same reasons for which people have called me “aggressive,” “weird” and “crazy,” guys my age would be called ambitious and assertive. They’re “going places.” I was about to re-affirm that people don’t like independent women, but let’s cut the bullshit: they don’t like women, period. So they tell us by standing up for ourselves we’re weird monsters, and they’ve fed us this gnarly idea about being “nice.”

“Nice” means, as most girls have probably realized by their early teens: don’t talk too loud, let guys cut across you, don’t disagree with guys, never tell them they’re wrong (it would make them feel bad!), don’t do anything to make guys uneasy, don’t say no when a guy asks you out, especially if he made a romantic gesture (that would be mean!), laugh it off and be flattered when you’re being objectified and degraded, and generally make yourself as easy to deal with as possible, especially for guys, and never stand up for yourself.

Spelled out like this, it’s easy to see how dehumanizing and sick this. When I think about it this way, I realize I have to intention of being “nice” in the way that many people think about it. Yes, I want to cause trouble for them: they cause a world of trouble for my sisters and I, and it needs to end.

My girlfriend pointed out to me recently that I speak so quietly a lot of the time that she can’t always hear what I’m saying. She’s right, and I started thinking about why I do that. I started thinking things like, Well, I don’t want to talk over people. I don’t want to be rude. But why the hell is me speaking at an audible volume being rude? It’s part of the internalized misogyny I’ve absorbed- that I should be sitting down and shutting up. But that’s wrong. Women’s place is in the revolution—we are not a product to be sanitized and commodified.  My role is not to be easy to deal with. My role is to call you out, sit you down, and rise up with my sisters to create a new way of thinking. Where women aren’t “bad girls” or made to feel ashamed for being humans with their own views and judgment calls. And it’s not just for next generation—as Kwame Ture said,

“I don’t think that we should follow what many people say, that we should fight to be leaders of tomorrow. Frederick Douglass said that the youth should fight to be leaders today. And God knows we need to be leaders today, ‘cause the men who run this country are sick, are sick.”

Black power has always resonated with me and is more relatable to feminism than many would have you think.

So, do I dress a certain way to bother people? No, and I’m tired of people being selfish enough to assume it’s about them. It’s not. Do I sit around thinking, damn, how can I piss off the most people? No. I gather information, do research and then form opinions. Ladies, we need to stop taking shit and letting them distract us. Speak up, stand up and define “nice” for yourself. I'm right here with you.

A teen girl's (late) response to "Getting Over Girl Hate"

As a teenage girl and obvious feminist, internalized misogyny is a very straightforward issue that is clearly damaging for all involved. So seeing an article titled “Getting Over Girl Hate” with the premise of advocating love for other girls and fighting female competition, I was pretty stoked (even though the article is from 2011). However, like with most even remotely mainstream publications trying to cover issues I care about, I was massively disappointed.

Aside from the article being written like it’s just about petty high school drama, the serious problem for me in the article was where she said: “Look: confidence is not a crime. It does not mean a girl is a bitch or a slut, or thinks she’s better than you. It just means that she likes herself. And personally, I don’t wanna live in a world where any girl with healthy self-esteem is labeled a whore.”

Does she not see the obvious, glaring problem with that sentence? Did she really not realize that she just participated in “girl hate” by using gendered, misogynistic slurs? By separating “sluts” and “whores” from “girls,” she’s participating in slut shaming, female competition and disrespect towards other women. She’s saying that “sluts” and “whores” don’t deserve respect like “other girls” do. This majorly disappointed and frustrated me.
There’s a real name for “girl hate,” Rookie. It’s called internalized misogyny, and you just participated in it.

If the writer had followed the statement with something like “The word “slut” is a patriarchal construction to shame women for their own sexuality, and to insure they are harassed for being remotely sexually independent” or even an immature but well-intended statement like “There’s nothing wrong with being a slut” I would have been okay with it. But she didn’t. Because she isn’t actually promoting “girl love” here. This is not solidarity, this is not empowerment, it’s even more “girl hate” covered up by the pretense of “feminism” and caring about other women.

So please, stop trying to co-opt feminism for your own crappy, slut-shamey, misogynistic beliefs. Just know that the real fighters, including myself, will always side with the “sluts,” the “whores,” with the ladies that you don’t consider part of your feminism or worthy of respect. Because we are worthy. We are all sisters. So if you’re going to pretend like you believe in it, either start acting like it or just drop the act. When you decide to actually walk the walk, I'll be ready to hear about it, but until then, keep your fake support.

In solidarity,

Brit-El

We need REAL queer advocates: why we need to disown FCKH8 and Dan Savage, and shed fears of getting “radical”

Quick fact about the LGBT movement: It’s not all about gay marriage. In fact, it’s not even all about gays. Contrary to what Dan Savage would have you think, we are not only fighting for cisgendered, white gay males.

We need to step away from the FCKH8 model of falsely edgy “support” for LGBT causes, like same-sex marriage, by using harmful stereotypes and throwing huge parts of our community under the bus. I’m not against swearing at haters for kicks—but not only should that not represent the movement, FCKH8 is actively disrespectful to people they should be supporting. Aside from blatantly stealing ideas from actual charities like Stonewall, it’s an outright scam: see links at bottom of page. It seems like all they do is use the “sassy black woman” stereotype as a prop, perpetuate the sexualized image of lesbian relationships (not the same thing as acceptance!), dismiss asexuals (see screencap below)

and focus on defending male homosexuality. Ultimately, they’re a massive insult and disservice to the community. So, why do we let these people represent our movement?

The thing with the approach that FCKH8 and Dan Savage take is that it’s barely even for us queers. It’s targeted at making straight “allies” feel like they’re awesome because they don’t bully gays. Sorry guys, but you don’t deserve a medal for being a decent human being. Can we move on to the real issues now? Same-sex marriage is a start, and it’s already pretty popular. Let’s keep going. How about trans/gender nonconforming recognition and protection? How about access to their appropriate school facilities and fair treatment in the workplace? How about fair access to healthcare for trans and queer people, and how about we address the fact that trans and queer people are more vulnerable to experience violence from family members and officers of the law? Addressing the violence and hatred queer and trans people experience from those they should trust the most has a quick answer—solidarity. 

We need a community that cares about ALL queers, not just gay men and lesbians. And that community needs to take care of its own, starting with supporting each other on a basic level by empowering queers of all identities, working ensure access to healthcare for transgender people (especially youth), and fighting police corruption/targeting of LGBT people, to start with. That’s a few steps we need to take. That’s what charity should be going towards—not some obnoxious FCKH8 rep’s pocket. (Did I mention they’re for profit?)

There’s also stigmas in our own community we need to fight—negativity towards genderqueers/agendered people, denial of pansexuality, etc. We need to stop disrespecting each other. 

We need solidarity and community, and we need to stop caring about being accepted by mainstream media, industry and politics. We don’t have the time to care about them. This is about us, and we need to advocate for everyone in our community. The time is now.

FCKH8's scam-ness:

http://www.sitejabber.com/reviews/www.fckh8.com

http://24.media.tumblr.com/a6929ebd5d5c67b7ade0767d8c6114fc/tumblr_mwfl25R53J1qa37hco1_500.png

The charity's merch from which FCKH8 stole their ideas: http://web.stonewall.org.uk/public/shop/default.aspx#Clothing

Assassination Market

Assassination Market. It sounds like a punk song. But for the past four months, it’s existed—serving as a sort of Kickstarter for the murder of politicians and other government figures. As someone who took the ending of Fight Club as political inspiration (more like revenge fantasy), as crazy as this is, it excites me. You know who's on the list? NSA director Keith Alexander, President Obama, Ben Bernanke. 

Funny enough, the man with the largest bounty on his corrupt-ass head is Bernanke, for $75,000. Personally, I hate that guy. Would I kill him? I dunno. Probably not. Ask me offline. But the fact that people want to says something, and that something is exciting. 

Just as exciting is the intention of the website. "Kuwabatake Sanjuro," (the name of the samurai protagonist of a Kurosawa film) creator of the site, hopes to enable enough assassinations that politicians won't have the guts to hold office. He wants to "destroy all governments, everywhere." He ultimately aims for

“…a world without wars, dragnet panopitcon-style surveillance, nuclear weapons, armies, repression, money manipulation and limits to trade is firmly within our grasp for but a few bitcoins per person. I also believe that as soon as a few politicians get offed and they realize they’ve lost the war on privacy, the killings can stop and we can transition to a phase of peace, privacy and laissez-faire.”

It’s bold. Unrealistic, but bold. Some might feel that political assassination attacks democracy, and I disagree. For one, we don’t live in a democracy, we live in a republic with petty attempts at maintaining the illusion of caring about the people. But regardless, this stuff doesn’t attack “democracy.” Politicians attack democracy. The joke that is the presidential elections attacks democracy. And I’m pretty sure we did not vote for Ben Bernanke. So pipe down, yall. And as much as I admire the initiative behind this project, the potential impact of it all seems rather dubious. Being driven to this point says a lot about the current state of affairs, and you never really know what could happen—but a Second Coming of cypherpunk and cryptoanarchy is more than ok with me.

Sources:

http://www.thebitcoinchannel.com/archives/tag/assassination-market

http://www.forbes.com/sites/andygreenberg/2013/11/18/meet-the-assassination-market-creator-whos-crowdfunding-murder-with-bitcoins/

Setting the tone

Although I constantly use Facebook in the hopes of keeping people in the loop about things I find important, it's been a while since I actually wrote in an organized, journalistic manner. So as a way of introducing myself on a new platform as the queer punk feminist yall love, here's a bunch of songs to set the tone for this blog. Enjoy!

"Rise Above" - Black Flag

"Deadly Rhythm" - Refused

"Summerholidays vs. Punkroutine" - Refused

"The Fight Song" - Marilyn Manson

"Take The Power Back" - Rage Against the Machine

"Architects" - Rise Against

"A Wall Against the Wind" - Tom Morello: The Nightwatchman

"Children of the Grave" - Black Sabbath

"Township Rebellion" - Rage Against the Machine

You can listen to them all on a single playlist here: http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLTsfZ_HHjRDad1987MbdHzhfpDSCee-RX